CVA: Bringing Synergy and Social-Civil Progress to Global-Stellar Peoples
CVA: Bringing Synergy and Social-Civil Progress to Global-Stellar Peoples
Conceiving a governance style involving Stratum Civil Enterprisation; applying Decency and Civility with Layered Social-Capitalism.
CVA is seeking to ensure balanced caring, well-being and thrivability for all unique peoples within all regions, nations, provinces, states, counties, shires.
In that pursuit, CVA is bringing forth the term Sivstraterism (Sǐv-strǎt-ǝr-ǐsm) to broaden concepts of governance well beyond the Left-Right Line range forced on people by the currently primary parties who are still desperately holding to their influence despite what is best for the populations.
Establishing balanced economies and business companies along with qualities set within the U.S. Constitution; establishing Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.
Let us all remember the preamble of the U.S. Constitution sets the General Welfare for 'The People,' not Corporations. This meaning the qualities within the Preamble is for all people, no matter who was able to vote from one decade to another.
The U.S. Constitution also uses 'Ourselves and Our Posterity.' As 'ourselves and our Posterity' is used, all the qualities set down are for the current People and future generations. In that, we are to ensure families and kivfamrens (a term presented within Arinora for synergetic cohesive kith and kid) are thriving for their lives, as well as those who will come.
Creative Vision Assembly is further striving to bring these balancing qualities to all people throughout this world, as well as any settlements beyond this world. This and those views brought forth within this site, as well as Arinora, are part if Striventerism.
Coined by BCW when he wrote Tarrarian Plight in 2002, this relates to layers of nobility within tribal-clan environments and societies; where Chieftains of clans or tribes are nobility, with a Royal Dynasty providing high authority and protection, as well as full well-being of the population.
This governing style relates to finding common Democratic elements of populations, applying policies and legislation to bring people to those elements that is considered common to their societies.
When visualizing Central Democracy, imagine a wide rounded field with everyone facing the center of that field. People closer to the center are more common to each other who are standing around them, where those further out have less in common with those closer to the center and more to those towards their left and right. People further from the center are more unique, and not as homogenized to a bland commonality of society.
Those more distant from the center have greater uniqueness; though, will not have reasonable representation within Central Democracy. Those who are closest to the center area of the field lack uniqueness within the population, and find unique people overly radical. Amongst those within the field, people having commonality will cluster together, even at the outer areas of the field. Again, those further away from the central area of the field will have less representation, since they have greater uniqueness, and are less homogenized. Those unique persons will see those at the center as boring and bland.
This form of governance is what the many factions claim to be striving for. However, each faction view they have a better sense of common views, wanting to press people to what they see as the Common Denominator, declaring, ‘That’s what the people want.’
The many factions will cite pulling studies that favor their agendas. These pulling studies are worded in ways to lead people towards their agenda by limiting options within questions.
As opposed to Guerrilla Capitalism; Civil Capitalism holds to a broader scope of population enterprises, fully restraining bullying from larger business companies.
When it comes to justice and legislation, all aspects of legislation, taxation, justice, and so on, will always favor smaller companies over larger companies no matter the situation. History has shown the bullying of effects of how larger companies will put pressures on smaller companies, forcing them to capitulate, sell out, or dissolve; leaving larger companies with fewer competitions. Stock traders relish such an environment, though such environments are not beneficial to the greater portion of populations within societies.
Possibly associated with Democratic Socialism, Civil Socialism does not hold to any aspects of dictatorship; in that the leading executives have strict limitations and is subject to legislators that provide for the well-being of all people in their multitude of aspects within jurisdictions.
In similar form, provinces and regions would have administrative governance to ensure the well-being of populations, and the many elements would have considerable services to strengthen the sciences, education, protection and well-being of all persons.
Often related to Dictator Socialism by Conservative views in order to confuse populations, most often steering to Guerrilla Capitalism, Democratic Socialism holds to the assurances that the well-being of populations, in their many forms, are assured by representatives that are elected for the benefit of the population.
Also known as Authoritative Capitalism, this form of Capitalism is dominated by the most ruthless of business companies under the authority of a singular dictator who maintains high avenues of control that provides considerable income to their person, as well as family and cooperative associates. This form of governance functions much like Felonious Syndicates, though will keep their associations with seedier elements private.
The Supreme Authority – the Dictator – controlled companies, as well as their own; giving full favors to those they themselves own, as well as their dynastic family. Other persons and companies who are cooperative and pay tribute will gain favors; though this is highly limited; and all benefits will always favor the Supreme Authority.
In many ways, the Supreme Authority – even if elected in some form of democratic – behaves as a Mobstoffia environment. The Supreme Authority, even if done subtly, will bully other elements of societies, applying policies, legislative directives and their sense of justice to favor themselves, disfavoring any element that is in opposition to the Supreme Authority. Supreme Authority would be known by critics as Mobster Bullies.
Historically, Dictator Socialism has become associated with Singular Guild-Union governance, where a single political party maintains full control of society and policies, as well as the entire population.
Though Fascism rose much the same as dictators Socialism—having rose due to the implementation of a Labor Union Movement—Fascism has taken on a distinct meaning associated with narrow cultural qualities set down by dictator personalities. In most all ways, Fascism is the same as Dictator Socialism, the lacks the social services for the entire population.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.